note
Paulster2
<p>[tye], I think you totally summed up what I was asking in the first place, and maybe wasn't getting my point accross. The whole purpose of my original question was to make sure that I was doing things right for the site. I like the idea of a "disapproved" selection, because I have found nodes that I believe need some help. I <i>have</i> read the site documentation on the approval process. <br><br><center><i>Only editors are supposed to be able to approve reaped nodes.</i></center><br><br>I don't want to, nor have I ever tried to approve a <i>reape<b>d</b></i>, only the Reaper owned nodes that appear after the reaped node is replaced. My original question only applies to those Reaper nodes that appear in the approval/moderation portion of the page. Should the Reaper nodes be unmoderated? I think that it should, because it provides only an informational source, not a content source of the original message. Isn't it just a placeholder of the original message? I also think that these nodes should have the ++/-- radials taken off of them. No need to vote on them. (Not that I have!!) <br><br>In the mean time, I will no longer <i>approve</i> any of the Reaper nodes. I don't want to create any problems for the site, I am only trying to make it better. Thanks [tye], [chromatic] and [Happy-the-monk], I appreciate the clarifications and the opportunity to correspond with each of you.</p>
<div class="pmsig"><div class="pmsig-299295">
<p>Paulster2</p><br><b><i>You're so sly, but so am I.</i> - Quote from the movie <i>Manhunter</i>.</b>
</div></div>
363635
366420