note
Anonymous Monk
I didn't misunderstand. I was just not clear enough.<p>
I meant that to be a resource you can use in discussions with people whose understanding of structured programming is more religious than practical.<p>
As for [goto], very few are "necessary", and experience says that so-called necessary [goto]s generally have a better replacement. Furthermore the ability to combine loop control and named loops removes the vast majority of [goto] statements - including <b>every</b> one that Knuth pointed to in his rebuttal as being useful for algorithmic efficiency. So while I might agree that necessary [goto]s are OK, I likely mean something different by that than you do.
181789
182033
3