Re^4: Top 11 (GOOD) reasons not to use someone else's Modules

in reply to Re^3: Top 11 (GOOD) reasons not to use someone else's Modules
in thread Top 11 (GOOD) reasons not to use someone else's Modules

I'd estimate that on average...That's not scientific rigor.

How does "I'd estimate" suggest "scientific rigor"?

It doesn't. Strawman.

... the blanket acceptance... You're putting words in sundial's post.

No. Fairly summarising his own words: "software professionals all".

Seems fair to me to assume that a software professional will use professional judgment

Resisting the urge to hoist you with your own unscientific petard, your assumption flies in the face of the evidence: "software professionals all".

You further compound that by leaping to the defense of the indefensible.

Comment on Re^4: Top 11 (GOOD) reasons not to use someone else's Modules

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Top 11 (GOOD) reasons not to use someone else's Modules by chromatic (Archbishop) on Apr 24, 2012 at 18:00 UTC
Fairly summarising his own words: "software professionals all". In context, clearly talking about uploaders. He made no comment about what they uploaded. Strawman It's as much a strawman as it isn't a Scotsman.	[reply]

In Section Meditations