Re^2: Moose performance

in reply to Re: Moose performance
in thread Moose performance

Show your code. Show your measurement numbers for performance.

That isn't fair. You know what the issue is and it isn't right to try push it back on the OP to demonstrate the performance overhead of Moose.

Every time someone is surprised by the overhead of Moose in small short lived programs we seem to reply in the following sequence (where each one is admitted more grudgingly):

It is just the startup that is slow. Moose is fine for long lived programs.
You can use Mouse if you have to.
Moose isn't a good fit for short lived programs.

Perhaps it would be more honest if we replied in the reverse order.

--
John.

Comment on Re^2: Moose performance

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Moose performance by Anonymous Monk on Nov 12, 2011 at 02:01 UTC
That isn't fair. You know what the issue is and it isn't right to try push it back on the OP to demonstrate the performance overhead of Moose. You're confusing one Anonymous Monk for someone who knows Moose is slow	[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom