Your Mother has asked for the wisdom of the Perl Monks concerning the following question:
Pod::Coverage::Moose (0.02). Why The Following-
Test file
use strict; use warnings; use Test::Pod::Coverage; use Test::More "no_plan"; pod_coverage_ok( "IsMoose", { coverage_class => "Pod::Coverage::Moose" } );
IsMoose package file
package IsMoose; use Moose; has [qw( moo cow )] => is => "rw", isa => "Str" ; 1; # (Update, added.) =pod =cut
Test output
> prove test-moose-pod.t -v test-moose-pod.t .. ok 1 - Pod coverage on IsMoose 1..1 ok All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=1, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.00 sys + 0.21 cusr + 0.01 csys = 0.24 CPU) Result: PASS
Why isn't that failing? moo and cow are uncovered. This is a boiled down example. I tried several other permutations and my real code with Moose attribute methods and Roles and such are also passing as if it were being tested with plain Test::Pod::Coverage; e.g., only sub named {} are being checked at all.
Do I misunderstand what this does? Am I suffering from PEBCAK?
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re: Does Pod::Coverage::Moose work or am I just being obtuse?
by Khen1950fx (Canon) on Feb 23, 2010 at 13:21 UTC | |
by Your Mother (Archbishop) on Feb 23, 2010 at 18:00 UTC | |
by Khen1950fx (Canon) on Feb 24, 2010 at 08:07 UTC | |
Re: Does Pod::Coverage::Moose work or am I just being obtuse?
by webfiend (Vicar) on Aug 06, 2010 at 22:15 UTC |
Back to
Seekers of Perl Wisdom