Birth of a Perl Monk

Comment on Birth of a Perl Monk

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Birth of a Perl Monk by lemming (Priest) on Apr 06, 2001 at 00:29 UTC
Congrats! Of course you could just give her the time stamp of 986289780 local or 986264580 for gmtime. And just because I was curious: Sun Sep 9 at 01:46:40 gmtime, we're getting that 10th digit of seconds. woo woo!	[reply]
Re: Birth of a Perl Monk by buckaduck (Chaplain) on Apr 07, 2001 at 02:01 UTC
I just know I'm getting voted down for this nitpick, but that cool timestamp would have been on February 4th, not April 2nd. And I know you wouldn't want to change the format to YY-DD-MM; it's just not good for sorting. But at least you can stop regretting that you were so close... But seriously, congratulations. buckaduck	[reply]
Re: Re: Birth of a Perl Monk by myocom (Deacon) on Apr 07, 2001 at 22:59 UTC
You know, it's funny...I had exactly that same realization yesterday. ++ to you!	[reply]
Re: Birth of a Perl Monk by extremely (Priest) on Apr 06, 2001 at 00:07 UTC
Hum. Monkette? Monklette? Maybe a more classical diminutive like Monkie? -- $you = new YOU; honk() if $you->love(perl)	[reply]
Re^2: Birth of a Perl Monk by tadman (Prior) on Apr 06, 2001 at 02:01 UTC
Surely not Monkee. That would be confusing.	[reply]
Re: Birth of a Perl Monk by TStanley (Canon) on Apr 06, 2001 at 03:50 UTC
Congrats myocom!! May she bring you both joy and happiness! Plus a lot of sleepless nights :-P TStanley In the end, there can be only one!	[reply]