Re^4: Which came first?

The reporting of that research appears to confuse being an ancestor with having a common ancestor

Comment on Re^4: Which came first?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Which came first? by CountZero (Bishop) on May 03, 2008 at 06:39 UTC
Thanks, that's a relief. So I guess it is save to go into the chicken coop again? CountZero A program should be light and agile, its subroutines connected like a string of pearls. The spirit and intent of the program should be retained throughout. There should be neither too little or too much, neither needless loops nor useless variables, neither lack of structure nor overwhelming rigidity." - The Tao of Programming, 4.1 - Geoffrey James	[reply]
Re^6: Which came first? by swampyankee (Parson) on May 03, 2008 at 21:49 UTC
If you can stand the smell.... Information about American English usage here and here. Floating point issues? Please read this before posting. — emc	[reply]

In Section Past Polls