Re: Dealing with An(?:no|on)ytroll

in reply to Dealing with An(?:no|on)ytroll

Check out this node for a suggestion concerning the feeding of Trolls. Maybe a couple of weeks on there will be a little more support for this idea?

DWIM is Perl's answer to Gödel

Comment on Re: Dealing with An(?:no\|on)ytroll

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Dealing with An(?:no\|on)ytroll by tirwhan (Abbot) on Nov 27, 2005 at 10:42 UTC
I liked the alternative suggestion in that node, which was added as an update, to give AM posts a minimum reputation floor of -9. I was kinda approaching the problem from a slightly different angle, I think consideration and reaping is the way to deal with obvious trolls and wanted to make that somewhat easier. Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it. -- Brian W. Kernighan	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^2: Dealing with An(?:no|on)ytroll
by tirwhan (Abbot) on Nov 27, 2005 at 10:42 UTC

I liked the alternative suggestion in that node, which was added as an update, to give AM posts a minimum reputation floor of -9. I was kinda approaching the problem from a slightly different angle, I think consideration and reaping is the way to deal with obvious trolls and wanted to make that somewhat easier.

Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it. -- Brian W. Kernighan

[reply]

In Section Perl Monks Discussion