http://qs321.pair.com?node_id=328551


in reply to Re: Site HTML filtering, Phase II
in thread Site HTML filtering, Phase II

OK, perhaps I'm overstating it a bit. It's not that much harder then &lsb;, &lbracket;, &ob;, or whatever, would be, and has the advantage of being a real HTML entity, and not something we just made up.

It took me a long time to be able to remember it too.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Site HTML filtering, Phase II
by Abigail-II (Bishop) on Feb 12, 2004 at 14:15 UTC
    Some googling seems to indicate that [ and ] are the SGML entity names.

    Abigail

[reply]
      Some googling seems to indicate that [ and ] are the SGML entity names.

      Some testing seems to indicate that Gecko doesn't support these, which probably means nothing else does either. Maybe I'll just put #91 in my sig... 

      $;=sub{$/};@;=map{my($a,$b)=($_,$;);$;=sub{$a.$b->()}}
split//,".rekcah lreP rehtona tsuJ";$\=$ ;->();print$/

      [download]
[reply]
[d/l]
        Well, it's not an HTML entity name, so I'm not surprised. That however doesn't mean Perlmonks can't support it. After all, I doubt that Gecko, or anything else, supports <readmore>. I thought Perlmonks support was the issue at hand in the post I was replying to.

        Abigail

[reply]

In Section Perl Monks Discussion