in reply to My name is 6, Perl 6
Most of the discussion about Perl6 has been the "RFCs", which are basically wishlists. Larry will then accept, modify, or veto each one. I know Larry pretty well by now. I know he'll accept them in such a way that a Perl5 hacker will still be a Perl6 hacker. After all, Larry himself doesn't want to learn a new language. {grin}
As an example, look how much the regular expressions got more powerful between Perl4 and Perl5. And yet, if you could write Perl4 regex, you had no problem using Perl5 regex--you just didn't get to take advantage of the cooler features.
But if you used the fringe features like $[, your code found only limited support, if it even worked at all.
Similarly, I'd bet that the number of things that really breaks between Perl5 and Perl6 will be minimal--just enough to open up a new realm of cool things, but perhaps things in the category of $[ will fall by the wayside.
So, in the words of the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, "don't panic!"
-- Randal L. Schwartz, Perl hacker
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
RE: RE: My name is 6, Perl 6
by turnstep (Parson) on Aug 26, 2000 at 21:31 UTC | |
by tilly (Archbishop) on Aug 26, 2000 at 21:55 UTC |