http://qs321.pair.com?node_id=177641


in reply to The Return of the Son of theMecha-Robotic Copy of the Clone of the Evil Twin of the Sequel to the Code Catacombs (episode 12)

there isn't a great mechanism for module review of this kind here.

What's wrong with the Code Catacombs now? The only thing I can think of is that it isn't the most prominent of sections. You can't frontpage posts and new entries are a fair ways down the Newest Nodes page. Still it seems like a decent place to post modules for review.

Perhaps something along the lines of Increasing Visibility of Reviews and Tutorials but for the Code Catacombs would be in order.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Section for Posting Modules
by Aristotle (Chancellor) on Jun 27, 2002 at 10:33 UTC
    I agree with the sentiment. If something that's already in place can serve a desired purpose, it's better than adding a new feature.

    Makeshifts last the longest.

Re: Re: Section for Posting Modules
by erikharrison (Deacon) on Jun 27, 2002 at 17:14 UTC

    Actually, that's pretty much what I'm proposing. But an additional issue with the Code Catacombs is that the docs (for those of you have been around awhile, and might not have noticed) tell us that the CC are being (informally) phased out with the invention of code tags. If the CC are to be where we do this (and I have no problem with that) I'd like to see the Perlmonks docs changed to reflect this, and they be given greater profile. I'd like to see the CC become the official place for this activity and I'd like to see this sort of behavior encouraged. That last part is what I think is most important.

    Cheers,
    Erik

    Light a man a fire, he's warm for a day. Catch a man on fire, and he's warm for the rest of his life. - Terry Pratchet