in reply to Re^8: Experimental features: autoderef vs postfix deref
in thread Experimental features: autoderef vs postfix deref
RonW,
I also have a C background, and agree about "state" variables being the Perl equivalent of C "static" variables.
say
substr+lc crypt(qw $i3 SI$),4,5
I also have a C background, and agree about "state" variables being the Perl equivalent of C "static" variables.
Using "state" simplifies cases like the following where one shouldn't have to remember to print an HTML header, but also doesn't want it more than once:
#!/usr/bin/perl use strict; use warnings; use feature qw{ state }; sub html { my ($text) = @_; # Make the header idempotent state $b_header++ or print "Content-type: text/html\n\n"; print $text; } html("<br>This is some html, prior to which a header is printed\n"); html("<br>This is too (but the header was printed already)\n");
Output:
Content-type: text/html <br>This is some html, prior to which a header is printed <br>This is too (but the header was printed already)
|
---|
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom