http://qs321.pair.com?node_id=11138393


in reply to Re: (SOLVED) parsing problems with prototype blocks (updated)
in thread (SOLVED) parsing problems with prototype blocks (precedence)

On a similar note, I was once experimenting with constants (i.e. sub(){value} with empty prototype) returning objects with overloaded operators.

I got bitten by the fact that < was interpreted as the start of of a diamond operator, leading to a compilation error.

(I showed this here, but can't find the thread ATM)

Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
Wikisyntax for the Monastery