http://qs321.pair.com?node_id=1065618


in reply to Re^10: Perl 5 Optimizing Compiler, Part 10: Kickstarter & Performance Benchmarks
in thread Perl 5 Optimizing Compiler, Part 10: Kickstarter & Performance Benchmarks

now the list is a bit better, indeed...

Can you please give an idea why 3a--3b and 4a-4b are in separate items.
Aren't these are speaking on exactly the same thing??
And also the same for 1a--1b...

To say, when Gerard announced that he will made new syntax - I was strictly against that and then I never did a smallest attempt to rewrite my (tiny) module for new syntax...
new syntax = no cookie...
this is a point of an agreement.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^12: Perl 5 Optimizing Compiler, Part 10: Kickstarter & Performance Benchmarks
by Will_the_Chill (Pilgrim) on Dec 10, 2013 at 07:56 UTC
    vkon,

    Maybe you're right and there is some overlap in the meaning of the points on this list. Suffice it to say that RPerl is about speed and maintaining backward compatibility with existing Perl 5 and XS. Kurila is not.

    Does that help?

    Thanks,
    ~ Will
      so the list should have been much shorter?
      not 5 items, but rather 1? or even zero items in this list??

      I am okay with small or even empty list, but the wrong one - stuffed with obviously wrong and repeated data - I want to trash it entirely and avoid it...

      Was it intentionally made visually bigger to look longer??

        Hi vkon,

        You seem to think that RPerl and Kurila are the same project. This is not true. Perhaps you could investigate both projects more closely, then make your own list of similarities and differences?

        This would help me understand your point of view.

        Thanks!

        Perling,
        ~ Will the Chill