http://qs321.pair.com?node_id=1023084


in reply to Re^4: itemconfigure in listbox (Tk)
in thread itemconfigure in listbox (Tk)

I don't buy it zentara. It's a coward's excuse for plagiarism.

I am not zentara.

Consider this
liverpole Monsignor (18) Writeups: 906
zentara Archbishop (23) Writeups: 6899

So in ~7k nodes, zentara didn't attribute a random uncopywritable (cause its too short) piece of code he had on his harddisk -- this is not plagiarism, zentara deserves better

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: itemconfigure in listbox (Tk)
by liverpole (Monsignor) on Mar 13, 2013 at 02:29 UTC
        "zentara didn't attribute a random uncopywritable (cause its too short)"

    O champion anonymous defender of zentara -- it's interesting you make the same grammar mistake zentara consistently makes, of writing "its" instead of "it's".

    But you're correct, it's not copywritable. Just sad that he couldn't have given credit where credit was due.


    s''(q.S:$/9=(T1';s;(..)(..);$..=substr+crypt($1,$2),2,3;eg;print$..$/

      O champion anonymous defender of zentara -- it's interesting you make the same grammar mistake zentara consistently makes, of writing "its" instead of "it's".

      No its not -- its the most common of typos

      Just sad that he couldn't have given credit where credit was due.

      What is sad is how pathetic you are

        Well, zentara himself says on his own poetry page:

            "I don't care if you use this stuff, just put who really authored it somewhwere on the same page."

        So it'll be enlightening to see how he, himself feels about the question of attribution (with dignity, that is, as opposed to anonymous cowardice).


        s''(q.S:$/9=(T1';s;(..)(..);$..=substr+crypt($1,$2),2,3;eg;print$..$/