http://qs321.pair.com?node_id=92529


in reply to JAHPH

The image is not in any way original (not that it was claimed to be), being as it was linked from Salon.com at some point this month in an article about cellphone technology (the image). And since it isn't original, I fail to see the value of wrapping it in three lines of Perl and calling it a JAPH. Or JAHPH.

I got a warning from Salon before I hit the link. If you just have to post pr0n to the monastery, I'd appreciate some sort of notice (prior to loading) that your post contains explicit images of females. Thanks!

e-mail neshura | Sure but whatsit worth to ya?