http://qs321.pair.com?node_id=907934


in reply to (Hopefully) simple sorting question

<EffectivnessDetective Rating="mildly amusing">
  <Title IsNotEffective EffectivnessScore="-2">
   <HasStopWord> simple </HasStopWord>
   <HasStopWord> question </HasStopWord>
   <HasStopWord> hopefully </HasStopWord>
   <HasGoWord> sorting </HasGoWord>
   <AutoSuggested>
     <AutoTitle> sorting coordinates first by x then by y </AutoTitle>
     <RelatedNode id="544435"> Sorting large sets of geometric coordinates </Node>
    </AutoSuggested>
  </Title>
  <Question IsEffective HasReceivedAnswer IsFaq EffectivnessScore="2">
    <HasCodeTags />
    <HasCoherentQuestion />
    <DoesNotHaveRealInput />
    <DoesNotHaveRealOutput />
    <DoesNotHaveExpectedOutput />
    <DoesNotHaveRealExpectedOutputDelta />
  </Question>
</EffectivnessDetective>
  • Comment on Re: (Hopefully) simple sorting question

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: (Hopefully) simple sorting question
by wfsp (Abbot) on Jun 03, 2011 at 09:59 UTC
    Code tags would have been nice. :-)
Re^2: (Hopefully) simple sorting question
by jdporter (Chancellor) on Dec 05, 2011 at 14:40 UTC

    XML Sucks.

    I reckon we are the only monastery ever to have a dungeon stuffed with 16,000 zombies.