Re: Re: Posting "Other Users" on potential personality voters from now on

in reply to Re: Posting "Other Users" on potential personality voters from now on
in thread Posting "Other Users" on potential personality voters from now on

Yes that option was fully explored a long time ago. It didn't really stand up to scruitiny. I could downvote your post and put "Because you're a moron" in as the reason and it doesn't fix anything. However I wouldn't do that.

Macphisto

Everyone has their demons....

Comment on Re: Re: Posting "Other Users" on potential personality voters from now on

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: Posting "Other Users" on potential personality voters from now on by scottstef (Curate) on Apr 10, 2001 at 16:31 UTC
At least we would KNOW it was a personality vote %^)	[reply]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Posting "Other Users" on potential personality voters from now on by little (Curate) on Apr 11, 2001 at 00:28 UTC
Erm, no, I don't think so. If you use the web and want to do something you would always enter mickey@mouse.com into the e-mail fields if required and imagine we would have the people to say: I downvoted because of missing information/ wrong information/not getting the point/I don't like the person posted. Would you feel better or even more hurt when the downvoters now will take their real chance to hurt you and to downvote you and to tell you that they don't like you and you'll never get them? And if you ommit the latter option to state the reason for downvoting you 'll get political correct statistics that are worthless in the real world. 0.02 Have a nice day All decision is left to your taste	[reply]

In Section Perl Monks Discussion