in reply to Posting "Other Users" on potential personality voters from now on
Has anyone ever considered a Mandatory anonymous comment feature for a down vote?
If you down vote, you have to give a reason?
Allow the voter to remain anonymous, but at least make them think for a moment before they get to downvote a node.
/start rant
Personally I rarely down vote anything that is not blatantly incorrect, extremely rude, or someone trying to sneak in a school project without admitting it.
The node that brought this up, is short(a definite ++), good to know (another ++), and probably very helpful to people that purchase future versions of the books. I just wonder why these people downvoted this node, I would like to see them defend their vote by commenting why they voted this way.
/end rant
Personally I rarely down vote anything that is not blatantly incorrect, extremely rude, or someone trying to sneak in a school project without admitting it.
The node that brought this up, is short(a definite ++), good to know (another ++), and probably very helpful to people that purchase future versions of the books. I just wonder why these people downvoted this node, I would like to see them defend their vote by commenting why they voted this way.
/end rant
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re: Re: Posting "Other Users" on potential personality voters from now on
by Macphisto (Hermit) on Apr 10, 2001 at 06:41 UTC | |
by scottstef (Curate) on Apr 10, 2001 at 16:31 UTC | |
by little (Curate) on Apr 11, 2001 at 00:28 UTC |
In Section
Perl Monks Discussion