http://qs321.pair.com?node_id=589414


in reply to Re^2: Looking for "random upvote" script
in thread Looking for "random upvote" script

I'm missing your point. If something deserves a down vote, it needs it now, not six months from now. If it's bad advice or just inflammatory, many eyes will see it and some will respond. A "Best Practice" post which seemed fine two years ago, may be down voted if posted today, but I fail to see the reason why one would hunt it down and down vote it now.
  • Comment on Re^3: Looking for "random upvote" script

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Looking for "random upvote" script
by chromatic (Archbishop) on Dec 12, 2006 at 21:59 UTC

    Ah, I missed the word down in your original post. I still disagree, but much less strongly. I apologize for the confusion.