in reply to Modify choices for Nodes to Consider
No. Keep the options as they are now.
I think keep is exactly the right word for not moving a node. Edit is indeed not a very good description for moving, but I don't like the words "yes" and "no". "Edit/move" would be sort of acceptable, but "yes" and "no" would IMO make improper considerations more frequent. It could make the impression that consideration is not a moderation tool but a general way to decide something about the post. (Especially because the nodelet title is "Approval Nodelet" instead of the more approperiate "Moderation Nodelet".) Yes, I know the documentated policy is against such misusage, but that's not enough.
Also you don't usually consider a node for moving: you either move it or consider for unapproving so that it can be moved.
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re^2: Modify choices for Nodes to Consider
by Perl Mouse (Chaplain) on Jan 05, 2006 at 17:09 UTC |