Re^2: time difference

in reply to Re: time difference
in thread time difference

A simple question but somehow it seems to be confusing the heck out of me!

I tried your code BrowserUK on UNIX and things did not come out well so I switched to Windows XP PRO.

Here is what I did

(Note: I changed your 'file' to 'junk')

1. I created a file with some content

2. After a few minutes i added some more content

3. I ran the timestamp program

I see funny results. No matter the file, i get the same result

. Can you throw some light?

C:\>echo hi > junk
C:\>dir junk

7/31/2005  10:25 PM                 5 junk
              1 File(s)              5 bytes
              0 Dir(s)  15,975,989,248 bytes free

C:\>echo hi2 >> junk

C:\>dir junk

07/31/2005  10:28 PM                11 junk
               1 File(s)             11 bytes
               0 Dir(s)  15,975,989,248 bytes free

C:\>perl timestamp
1 : 16 : 00 : 00
[download]

I am on activstate

C:\>perl -v

This is perl, v5.6.1 built for MSWin32-x86-multi-thread
(with 1 registered patch, see perl -V for more detail)
[download]

When I run the program on UNIX i get 31 : 18 : 00 : 00 as output

Any thoughts?

thanks

Comment on Re^2: time difference Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: time difference by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Aug 01, 2005 at 06:36 UTC
Two problems. First I forgot that -C -A & -M give their results in days rather than seconds like every other timestamp. Second, the days will always be +1 (because days of the month start from 1) and it would only work for values less than 31 (number of days in January). Original posts updated to reflect my laxity. Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error. Lingua non convalesco, consenesco et abolesco. -- Rule 1 has a caveat! -- Who broke the cabal? "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". The "good enough" maybe good enough for the now, and perfection maybe unobtainable, but that should not preclude us from striving for perfection, when time, circumstance or desire allow.	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^3: time difference
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Aug 01, 2005 at 06:36 UTC

Two problems.

First I forgot that -C -A & -M give their results in days rather than seconds like every other timestamp.
Second, the days will always be +1 (because days of the month start from 1) and it would only work for values less than 31 (number of days in January).
Original posts updated to reflect my laxity.

Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.

Lingua non convalesco, consenesco et abolesco. -- Rule 1 has a caveat! -- Who broke the cabal?

"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".

The "good enough" maybe good enough for the now, and perfection maybe unobtainable, but that should not preclude us from striving for perfection, when time, circumstance or desire allow.

[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom