http://qs321.pair.com?node_id=438177


in reply to Re: The greedy change-making problem using regexes
in thread The greedy change-making problem using regexes

Personally I would avoid the 1{10} stuff. For two reasons, first is that 1{10} is less efficient to match than "1" x 10, and second reason is that the speed of the regex once my trie patch gets applied will be massively faster as without the curlies it will be optimised and with them it wont. :-)

---
demerphq

  • Comment on Re^2: The greedy change-making problem using regexes

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: The greedy change-making problem using regexes
by theorbtwo (Prior) on Mar 10, 2005 at 11:02 UTC

    ...which suggests that the RE engine should convert a trivial match with a trivial curly in to the equivlent $match x $curly atoms. Of course, somehow I suspect that wouldn't really be a help for /x{2047}/.


    Warning: Unless otherwise stated, code is untested. Do not use without understanding. Code is posted in the hopes it is useful, but without warranty. All copyrights are relinquished into the public domain unless otherwise stated. I am not an angel. I am capable of error, and err on a fairly regular basis. If I made a mistake, please let me know (such as by replying to this node).