in reply to Re^6: A mini-language for sequences (part 1)
in thread A mini-language for sequences (part 1)
You may want to rephrase your point #7, as it can be taken two very different ways:
7. Much like Perl, modern FP languages require a serious investment of time before they become understood (and appreciated).or
7. Modern FP languages, such as Perl, require a serious investment of time before they become understood (and appreciated).I would assume you mean the former, but it's best to be clear.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^8: A mini-language for sequences (part 1)
by tmoertel (Chaplain) on Nov 08, 2004 at 19:28 UTC |
In Section
Meditations