http://qs321.pair.com?node_id=329279


in reply to Re: Re: First impressions of WWW::Curl::Lite
in thread First impressions of WWW::Curl::Lite

I'm not a benchmark guru, but I'd also like to see HTTP::MHTTP, HTTP::GHTTP and HTTP::Lite included in the benchmark too.

In my experience, MHTTP is the fastest, GHTTP is pretty close, and Lite is slower, but still faster than LWP. Like LWP, Lite is also pure Perl, and doesn't require a backend c library.


--
ajt