in reply to To Trinary or not to Ternary
In fact, my edition of the Camel mentions Trinary as well as Ternary as names for the conditional operator (?:). I know that when I used C++, we used the word ternary.
Some very brief research reveals that the word Trinary does not "exist," per se. But I believe that lwall & co. actually make a brief joke about the fact that trinary does not exists.
Who is Kayser Söze?
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re: Re: To Trinary or not to Ternary
by Not_a_Number (Prior) on Dec 05, 2003 at 18:44 UTC | |
by sauoq (Abbot) on Dec 05, 2003 at 18:58 UTC | |
by jweed (Chaplain) on Dec 06, 2003 at 06:28 UTC |
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom