I should have been less cavalier. The generation of random numbers is too important to be left to chance, as they say. One of the desirable features of PRNGs is that they have a provably long period before they start repeating themselves. By reseeding this way, you lose that. After a large number of iterations, you might end up in a short limit cycle of possible values for the next seed. That will depend on the details of your rand() and exactly how many times you call it per loop. So I'm afraid I have to take back my advice. Don't reseed this way, epecially if you're going to do a lot of loops.

You could use rand() with the initial seed to generate all the other seeds you need. You'd either have to know the number of loops ahead of time, or keep winding rand() forward from the initial seed.

The best solution would be to use a different random number generator that lets you get at the current seed value. There are several available. They're also easy to write -- just don't try to pick the constants yourself.