http://qs321.pair.com?node_id=179554


in reply to Return of the Confessional

Okay, here's my list ...

  • I've not used strict.
  • I've used symbolic references.
  • I've abused the Quantum family of modules in my own code.
  • I've done all of the three above in the same piece of code.
  • I've shamelessly referenced my own nodes.
  • I've selectively used map in a void context.
  • I've deliberately written code that was highly dependent upon execution order as defined in perlop.
  • I've learnt from and applied obfuscation techniques learnt from theDamian's selfgol piece of code.
  • I've done the above in production code.
  • I'm looking forward to Perl 6.

 

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Return of the Confessional
by ehdonhon (Curate) on Jul 06, 2002 at 21:39 UTC
    I've referenced my own nodes.

    Why is that bad?

Re: Re: Return of the Confessional
by mowgli (Friar) on Jan 03, 2003 at 15:50 UTC
    > I'm looking forward to Perl 6.
    
    Why is *that* bad?
    
    --
    mowgli