in reply to perl 2.01 on Cygwin
I'm curious why you picked Perl 2. Were you just wanting to try to compile something without a specific goal? Why not Perl 3, 4 or 5?
In Section
Cool Uses for Perl
in reply to perl 2.01 on Cygwin
I'm curious why you picked Perl 2. Were you just wanting to try to compile something without a specific goal? Why not Perl 3, 4 or 5?