http://qs321.pair.com?node_id=1190266


in reply to Re^4: Restricting Anonymous Monk to SOPW (board policy)
in thread Restricting Anonymous Monk to SOPW

But why worry about rude attacks from AM? Do they harm you; your kids; your relationships; or your future?

And did you drop a word of phrase in the para beginning "(n)ot opposing ...?" Perhaps a pronoun referring to the OP's proposal? Pls clarify: what are you "(n)ot opposing?". You can even do so in the anonymous insult, if you wish.1.


Spirit of the Monastery

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes. Juvenal, Satires

1 It hadn't occured to me that one might place a footnote below the sig.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: Restricting Anonymous Monk to SOPW (board policy)
by LanX (Saint) on May 14, 2017 at 21:36 UTC
    > But why worry about rude attacks from AM? Do they harm you; your kids; your relationships; or your future?

    I've already met some people who avoid PM because of the "tone", I mean also active contributors who blog or post on stackoverflow.

    It's sad to loose quality in exchange for some psychos and aggro nerds.

    Well whatever, I think it can't be helped.

    We need to settle on the level of badly formated FASTA questions and alike.

    Cheers Rolf
    (addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :)
    Je suis Charlie!

    update: fixed typo (Discipulus++ :)

    A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.