http://qs321.pair.com?node_id=11144811


in reply to Re: Detecting failures easily/obviously with cpanm
in thread Detecting failures easily/obviously with cpanm

I had considered the option of just re-running the whole lot to make the failures stand out, however that does make my inefficiency-spidey-sense start tingling. One of the modules in today's bundle was Mail::Spamassassin for instance and that takes several minutes to run its test suite. Still worth bearing in mind, though.

Thanks for the pointer to -q - I will definitely give that one a go.


🦛