Re^3: Doubley surprised by fat commas

English and C++, although I don't see how that is relevant to the question or discussion.

Optimising for fewest key strokes only makes sense transmitting to Pluto or beyond

Comment on Re^3: Doubley surprised by fat commas

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Doubley surprised by fat commas by Anonymous Monk on Jun 10, 2021 at 11:50 UTC
OP is a curious case of surprise. C++ wouldn't allow the syntax. C++ thinking rust? :)	[reply]
Re^5: Doubley surprised by fat commas by GrandFather (Saint) on Jun 10, 2021 at 21:23 UTC
My surprise had nothing to do with C++ thinking (or even Rusty thinking). Like Parv I was expecting undef since it's been a long time since I've been bitten in that way by Perl's trailing comma in a list implications. Optimising for fewest key strokes only makes sense transmitting to Pluto or beyond	[reply]