http://qs321.pair.com?node_id=11130838


in reply to Re^2: PadWalker's closed_over - but for our variables? (update: "declaration")
in thread PadWalker's closed_over - but for our variables?

I totally agree what you point out on the update. ;) what I want to empasize is the declaration of our acatually means declaring a alias to a a pkg variable, not declare a package variable itself.





I am trying to improve my English skills, if you see a mistake please feel free to reply or /msg me a correction