http://qs321.pair.com?node_id=11123464

syphilis has asked for the wisdom of the Perl Monks concerning the following question:

Hi,

I've read the overload documentation and I understand the basics of overloading the '=' operator.
I also understand that it's not really an overloading of the '=' operator - rather there's a process, that begins with doing $copy = $orig, whereby $copy ultimately becomes a separate copy of the Math::GMP object $orig just prior to taking on a new value.

In Math::GMP this can be demonstrated as:
use strict; use warnings; use Math::GMP; my $orig = Math::GMP->new(2); my $copy = $orig; # At this point $copy and $orig refer to # one and the same Math::GMP object. $copy += 5; # At this point, $copy refers to a newly # created Math::GMP object that holds a # value of 7; $orig still refers to the # original object, holding a value of 2. print "$orig\n"; # prints 2 print "$copy\n"; # prints 7
I have implemented the exact same thing in my Math::GMPz module - just replace all occurrences of "GMP" with "GMPz" and that little demo will behave in exactly the same way.
But now to the bit that I don't understand:

In Math::GMPz that overloading only works because, in GMPz.pm, I've done:
use overload ... , '=' => \&overload_copy, ... ;

If I remove that key-value pair from GMPz.pm then that particular overloading ceases to work. In that demo, both $copy and $orig will then end up referring to the very same (original) object, but with the new value of 7 - and the script crashes on termination.

OTOH, GMP.pm does not supply overload.pm with an '=', sub{} key-value pair at all.
How come this overloading still works for Math::GMP ?

Cheers,
Rob