http://qs321.pair.com?node_id=11120460


in reply to Re^4: Shouldn't references be readonly? (updated)
in thread Shouldn't LITERAL references be readonly? (updated)

> It would break some code

I think if it comes to simple scalar types like strings this would result in a migration nightmare.

Hence I wouldn't include the cases like $x.$y, <>, etc at least by default.

Refs on the other hand should be immutable, because the result is always junk.

But I doubt we have the resources to implement that anyway.

Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
Wikisyntax for the Monastery