http://qs321.pair.com?node_id=11117723


in reply to Re^2: Constructive thoughts on Dancer2 v Mojolicious
in thread Constructive thoughts on Dancer2 v Mojolicious

This node falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Constructive thoughts on Dancer2 v Mojolicious
by marto (Cardinal) on Jun 05, 2020 at 16:33 UTC

    1nickt said "The main app is built in Mojo. Personally I choose Dancer2 at work and at home and I have contributed to the project."

    You replied (quoting "The main app is built in Mojo.") "Pretty-please do not become yet another developer who imposed a personal preference onto a project, thereby greatly adding to its complexity.", both literally the opposite of what you are told, and also false in that "greatly adding to its complexity" is baseless, like pretty much everything you post here.

Re^4: Constructive thoughts on Dancer2 v Mojolicious
by 1nickt (Canon) on Jun 05, 2020 at 16:46 UTC

    Please fuck off, Mike. I have had enough. I have personally worked with you as a consultant and I know that you couldn't get the hello world examples from the synopsis of either framework to run.

    I do not welcome any commentary from you that is addressed to me. Surely that is clear? You are not welcome to comment on my posts here at PerlMonks. If you address me again I will smack you again. You are not worthy.


    The way forward always starts with a minimal test.