in reply to Re: Why a regex *really* isn't good enough for HTML, even for "simple" tasks
in thread Why a regex *really* isn't good enough for HTML and XML, even for "simple" tasks
Actually, as the page itself contains "confusing" (to Chrome) information, this is somewhat explainable. The HTML is XML, but it later declares a Content-Type of text/html. Changing that to Content-Type text/xhtml makes (WWW::Mechanize::)Chrome report the correct links.
Interesting, thanks! According to several sources on the W3C website, the correct MIME type is application/xhtml+xml, so I've changed that.
In Section
Meditations