Re^4: If a safe, affordable anti-ageing treatment that extended life indefinitely were to become available, would you take it?

The sentiment is there, i agree. But then why take any medicine at all? What or where exactly is the difference between the two?

Comment on Re^4: If a safe, affordable anti-ageing treatment that extended life indefinitely were to become available, would you take it?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: If a safe, affordable anti-ageing treatment that extended life indefinitely were to become available, would you take it? by GotToBTru (Prior) on Nov 11, 2014 at 22:39 UTC
Not taking known effective medicines would be a disrespectful waste of resources, just like not wearing a coat in winter or performing basic hygiene tasks. If I can avoid dying to no end, I should do so - to live is Christ. I have nothing to fear when I do eventually die - to die is gain. 1 Peter 4:10	[reply]
Re^6: If a safe, affordable anti-ageing treatment that extended life indefinitely were to become available, would you take it? by chacham (Prior) on Nov 12, 2014 at 13:38 UTC
But isn't this medicine too?	[reply]

In Section Past Polls