but not reasoning for changing the hash algorithm itself

Sure it is. A strong hash function is harder to attack.

why you would do it on a hash-by-hash basis rather than a per-process basis.

Concerns over information exposure of key order to an attacker.

I don't get the reluctance to share this information?

If there is any reluctance it is purely that of me wanting to avoid a long dialog repeating what has already been said elsewhere. I have a lot of demands on my time these days.